WebFeb 7, 2014 · In C#, an implicit implementation (with the set) can satisfy both of these: class Foo : ISimpleInterface, IExtendedInterface { public string ErrorMsg { get; set; } public string SomeOtherProperty {get; set;} } If you want to change it, you can use explicit implementation ("Implements" in VB?) - in C#: WebExample: interface property implementation c# using System; interface IName { string Name { get; set; } } class Employee : IName { public string Name { get; set; } } Menu NEWBEDEV Python Javascript Linux Cheat sheet

Interface Properties - C# Programming Guide Microsoft …

Web1) To achieve security - hide certain details and only show the important details of an object (interface). 2) C# does not support "multiple inheritance" (a class can only inherit from one base class). However, it can be achieved with interfaces, because the class can implement multiple interfaces. Note: To implement multiple interfaces ... WebSep 29, 2024 · You can define an implementation for members declared in an interface. If a class inherits a method implementation from an interface, that method is only … how a flexible spending account works

Implement a Property in an Interface in C# Delft Stack

WebDec 10, 2024 · No and Yes. An interface can't have state but you can define a property with {get;set;}. Auto properties aren't a special type of property. They are a convenience feature that generates the code needed to store property values in a backing field. You can specify a default implementation for properties, both for getters and setters. WebNov 27, 2010 · Having an interface allows you to reuse and modify code more easily. If you have an interface IFoo and an implementation SimpleFoo that implements IFoo in a naive way you can program against the interface and get basic functionality. Later you can make an AdvancedFoo implementation that also implements the same IFoo interface. Now … WebMay 25, 2011 · If you are implicitly implementing an interface I believe that the member must be declared public. In your example, CA attempts to implicitly implement the X () method but isn't declared public. If you want to keep X () as internal then you should use explicit interface implementation. void IA.X () { /* stuff */ } how many horses do you see